It appears Your Lordships; Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde, Your Lordship Dhananjeya Chandrachud, that “URGENT MATTERS ONLY” IN HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ARE ONLY FOR ARNAB GOSWAMI & HIS COUNSELS. Equality before law.
- Arnab Goswami has a privilege of moving directly to the Supreme Court of India.
- For Arnab Goswami, has Bombay High Court, any constitutional relevance?
- Arnab Goswami’s cases are listed fast & even Orders are passed by Hon’ble Lordships!
- Your Lordships may review what’s this SPECIAL STATUS TO ARNAB GOSWAMI; WHEN J&K SPECIAL STATUS IS ABOLISHED, WHY A SPECIAL STATUS GIVEN TO ARNAB GOSWAMI?
- Your Lordships should advice Counsels for Arnab Goswami to approach Hon’ble High Court first!
- Quashing of FIR, U/s 482, Cr. P. C. 1973, can be done by Hon’ble High Courts!
- Saving of inherent powers of High Court. Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or affect the inherent powers of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under this Code, or to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.
I rest my case, in the interest of common man, “we the people of India”.
Thanks Your Lordships.
☆ Google News carrying the following article of Indian Express as showeth below :-
Arnab Goswami moves top court against FIR linked to Bandra migrant gathering, contending that the “FIR is politically motivated” and that Mumbai Police “harbors ill-will and malice towards” him, Goswami has sought protection from coercive action and quashing of the FIR.
By: Express News Service | New Delhi |
Updated: May 6, 2020 7:32:17 am
The Maharashtra Government has approached the Supreme Court, accusing Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami of “browbeating” investigators by “creating fear psychosis”.
Fresh FIR against Arnab Goswami for ‘disturbing communal harmony.’
Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami has approached the Supreme Court again over a fresh FIR by Mumbai police in connection with a TV show on the gathering of migrants outside Bandra railway station on April 14.
The FIR was lodged on a complaint by secretary of Raza Educational Welfare Society, Irfan Abubakar Shaikh, alleging that Goswami tried to create hatred against Muslims through the show.
Denying the charge, Goswami has said in his plea, “Republic TV was the first TV channel to report the fact that political interest groups, mainly leaders of the Congress were spreading false news and orchestrating lockdown violations in Mumbai, was matter of national concern.”
Goswami is also learnt to have moved a separate application, seeking stay on the investigation in an earlier FIR against him regarding a TV show on Palghar lynching or transfer of the investigation outside Maharashtra. In that show, he had posed certain questions on the incident to Congress President Sonia Gandhi, following which Congress workers lodged complaints against him in various States.
On April 24, while hearing a plea by Goswami, the Supreme Court granted him protection for three weeks from coercive action in connection with these FIRs. The court had stayed all FIRs against him, except one registered in Nagpur. The court transferred that FIR to Mumbai to be investigated with the FIR regarding the alleged attack on Goswami and his wife.
On May 2, the State Government approached the Supreme Court, accusing Goswami of ‘’browbeating” the investigators.📣
( For reference of:
Press information Bureau,
India Today live News,
NDTV, Prannoy Roy, Aroon Poorie, Amar Ujala, Dainik Jagran, Sanjay Gupta, @httweets The Hindustan Times, Bhupendra Chaubey, News Laundary, Doordarshan, jagran.com
, The Times of India, Mid Day, Afternoon Dispatch, AICC Communications, BJP Media, Dainik Bhaskar, CPI – M, Sitaram Yechury, D. Raja, J.P. Nadda, Mumbai Police, DGP- Maharashtra, Mumbai Police Commissioner, Samna, Sandesh, Panchjanya)